Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to perfetto-mcp-rs

  • F
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A FastMCP server that provides LLMs with structured access to Scalene's CPU, GPU, and memory profiling for Python applications. It enables automated performance analysis, bottleneck identification, and optimization suggestions through natural language interactions in supported IDEs.
    7
    1
    -

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server that gives AI agents access to your application's OpenTelemetry traces for querying, analysis, and debugging.
    5
    10 npm
    2
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    An MCP server that converts Windows WPR .etl performance traces into structured JSON summaries and flamegraph-ready data for LLM analysis. It bridges Windows Performance Analyzer automation with LLM reasoning capabilities for performance troubleshooting.
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    An MCP server that connects Claude (or any MCP compatible client) to your existing log infrastructure. Query, summarize, and trace logs in plain English across GCP Cloud Logging, AWS CloudWatch, Azure Log Analytics, Grafana Loki, and Elasticsearch without writing filter expressions or leaving your editor.
    204 npm
    4
    MIT
  • F
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server that exposes llm-tldr code analysis tools (tree, structure, context, search, impact, etc.) to MCP clients like Claude Code for project understanding and debugging.
    18
    -

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 17 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct purposes (page-load summaries, resource hotspots, main-thread hotspots, scroll jank, startup, interactions). However, `chrome_page_load_resource_summary`, `chrome_page_load_resource_hotspots`, and `chrome_page_load_resource_pipeline` all deal with resource URL analysis and could be confused, though their descriptions clarify the intended sequence (summary → hotspots → pipeline). The generic `execute_sql` and `list_*` tools are clearly separate.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent snake_case pattern with a clear domain prefix: `chrome_*` for Chrome-specific analysis, `list_*` for exploration, `execute_sql`, `load_trace`, `slice_descendants_breakdown`. Verbs are uniform (list, load, execute, chrome_page_load_*, chrome_main_thread_*) and the naming clearly indicates the tool's function.

Tool Count4/5

17 tools is on the higher side but justified for a comprehensive Perfetto trace analysis server covering Chrome performance domains (page loads, resources, main thread, jank, startup, interactions) plus general SQL and schema exploration. Each tool serves a distinct purpose, and the count reflects the breadth of the domain without being bloated.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers major Chrome performance analysis workflows (page loads, resources, main-thread tasks, scroll jank, startup, web interactions) plus generic trace exploration (processes, threads, tables, SQL). Minor gaps exist: no dedicated tool for memory or CPU profile analysis, and the resource pipeline depends on the summary/hotspots sequence, but `execute_sql` covers custom needs.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessSlow