hiero-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to hiero-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceLets AI clients inspect and control DaVinci Resolve projects via MCP tools.4668 npm38MIT
- FlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for inspecting and controlling Blackmagic Fusion Studio through its scripting API.452-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA production-grade MCP server for Foundry Nuke that enables AI assistants to understand and manipulate compositing environments, including AOVs, deep workflows, distortion, tracking, OCIO/ACEScct, and CopyCat ML.45MIT
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceEnables podcast producers and agents to manage multitrack projects, run per-track transcription, perform transcript-driven edits, process audio via FFmpeg, and inspect a read-only DAW timeline over MCP.183MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables users to query and manage Kitsu/Zou production data, including projects, shots, assets, tasks, people, previews, video review, and optional write actions, through an MCP interface. Supports local stdio use and hosted HTTP connectors with per-user Kitsu authentication and read-only defaults.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables language models to inspect the current Houdini scene, create and modify nodes, and run VEX/Python code in the running Houdini session via MCP.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 45 tools
Most tools map to distinct resource/action pairs across projects, bins, clips, sequences, tracks, shots, tags, selection and viewer. A few close pairs exist (get_clip vs get_track_item, update_sequence vs update_track_item, the various list_* tools), but descriptions make the boundaries mostly clear. execute_python is an explicit catch-all and does not substantially muddy the dedicated tools.
The set is predominantly consistent snake_case verb_noun naming (list_projects, create_sequence, update_track_item, add_tag). Minor deviations include new_project instead of create_project, and standalone verbs such as undo, redo and razor. These are readable and predictable overall.
With 45 tools this is a very heavy surface for a single MCP server, even for a complex DCC integration. Many list/get variants and separate tag, selection, viewer and effect tools make the set harder to navigate than necessary. Some consolidation would improve usability.
Core lifecycle coverage is strong for projects, bins, clips, sequences, tracks and track items, and export/tag/selection/viewer basics are present. Notable gaps remain around effects (add only, no update/delete/list), export job status/cancellation, and project settings editing. execute_python can work around these gaps, but they are still visible omissions.