Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MangoMe

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding providers to coordinate structured multi-agent workflows with documents, tracked tasks, handoffs, and health evidence. It owns task claims, action logs, and final health results while leaving specification files on the filesystem.
      29 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A machine-enforced workflow protocol for AI coding agents that eliminates false progress. Tasks require verifiable evidence to close, while decisions, assumptions, and open questions persist in a versioned reasoning graph for seamless agent handoffs. Designed to keep deep, long-running projects coherent across sessions, agents, and months.
      39
      30
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding providers to run structured multi-agent workflows with tracked tasks, document specifications, handoffs, health gates, and server-owned evidence across providers like Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, Grok Build, and OpenCode.
      29 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables structured multi-agent workflows across AI coding providers by managing documents, tracked tasks, handoffs, health evidence, and MCP-owned task/action state. It supports spec creation, implementation coordination, review, triage, and health-gated completion.
      29 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.5/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Three read-oriented tools overlap heavily: mangome_observe, mangome_query and mangome_status all describe reading MangoMe state, differing only in vaguely stated scope ('context' vs 'identity/graph/truth/work state' vs 'bounded status'). mangome_work and mangome_control also blur, since both concern progressing/operating on governed work. An agent could easily misselect among these.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Every tool uses the same 'mangome_' prefix in snake_case, giving a predictable and readable set. The only minor deviation is that the suffixes mix verb forms (observe, verify, query) with noun forms (effect, work, control, status), which slightly reduces predictability.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools sits squarely in the well-scoped 3-15 range. Each represents a plausible distinct facet of the domain without obvious filler or a missing major operation.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers read/query/status, work progression, effect recording, control, and verification, which appears to span the governed-work lifecycle end to end. The heavily abstract descriptions leave some uncertainty about edge operations (e.g., identity creation or effect retraction), so a minor gap is possible.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues