camofox_go_back

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry full burden. It only states it navigates back, but fails to disclose that this is a state-changing operation (mutates tab history position), whether it may fail gracefully, or any side effects. Minimal behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: two sentences that immediately convey the tool's purpose without wasted words. The core action is front-loaded with 'Go back'.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 2 required parameters with no schema descriptions and no output schema, the description provides insufficient context. It does not explain parameter roles or return value, leaving the agent to guess.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds no meaning to the two parameters (tabId, userId). Since schema description coverage is 0%, the agent has no clue what these parameters represent. The description should at least indicate that tabId identifies the tab and userId identifies the user.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool navigates a Camoufox tab back to the previous page, using the verb 'navigate' and specifying the resource 'tab'. This distinguishes it from siblings like camofox_navigate (go to URL) and camofox_click (click elements).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. The description does not mention prerequisites, such as requiring an existing history entry, or when not to use it (e.g., if the tab has no history).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.