architecture_viewer
Related Servers
Alternatives to architecture_viewer
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that maps any repository into architecture diagrams, providing tools for scanning code facts, building import graphs, and generating Mermaid/DOT diagrams, plus architecture rule enforcement for CI.531 npm1MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for repository mapping, dependency analysis, and architecture diagram generation for JavaScript, TypeScript, and Python projects.47 npm-
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for generating and editing architecture diagrams from natural language or code, supporting formats like Terraform, docker-compose, Kubernetes, SQL, Mermaid, and PlantUML.2-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for automated architectural mapping, security vulnerability detection, ML asset tracking, and code metrics in local repositories.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that manages C4 architecture models, ADRs, and flow diagrams as TOML files in a docs directory, with git versioning and an HTTP viewer.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that generates beautiful Excalidraw architecture diagrams with perfect auto-layout, stateful editing, and architecture-aware component styling.26415 PyPI150MIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Tools are mostly distinct, but av_guard, av_session_report, av_session_changes, and av_check_layering all deal with architecture verification and could be confused by an agent unfamiliar with the daily vs session vs snapshot distinction. Descriptions provide guidance, reducing but not eliminating overlap.
All tool names use the av_ prefix and snake_case, with predictable action-oriented suffixes. The convention is uniform across the set.
Eight tools is a well-scoped set for an architecture verification/viewer server, covering session lifecycle, checks, and export without redundancy.
The surface covers start, change detection, reporting, status, guard, finding explanation, layering check, and export. Minor gaps might include direct finding listing or configuration, but core workflows are present.