Skip to main content
Glama
tomo1230

FreeCAD MCP Server

by tomo1230
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to FreeCAD MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • freecad-mcp

      maximedns5
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI-driven control of FreeCAD for CAD modeling, including creating, editing, measuring objects and running FEM analysis, via natural language interaction through Claude Desktop.
      36
      MIT

    • FreeCAD MCP

      fastmcp-me
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to control FreeCAD 3D modeling software, allowing creation and manipulation of 3D objects, execution of Python code, and interaction with FreeCAD's parts library through natural language.
      10
      MIT

    • freecad-tool-server

      mattackerman1
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to programmatically build, analyze, and export 3D CAD geometry using FreeCAD through REST or MCP tools.
      1
      MIT

    • FreeCAD MCP

      heok-yongssun
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables control of FreeCAD CAD software from Claude Desktop through natural language commands. Supports creating, editing, and managing 3D objects, executing Python code, and generating screenshots of designs.
      10
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2/5.0

    Scored across 57 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (e.g., create_cylinder vs create_box), but there are some ambiguous pairs like combine_by_name, combine_selection, combine_selection_all that could cause misselection. The large number of tools also increases confusion risk.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming pattern is predominantly verb_noun in snake_case, which is consistent. Minor deviations include single-word tools (undo, redo) and the phrase 'copy_body_symmetric' which breaks the pattern slightly, but overall it's readable and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 57 tools, the set is quite large, covering many primitive creations, constraints, and operations. While each tool has a specific role, the count feels on the high side for a single server, potentially overwhelming agents.

    Completeness3/5

    The toolset covers basic creation, sketching, constraints, and some feature operations, but lacks boolean operations (cut, union), sketch editing tools, and assembly capabilities. Notable gaps exist that may hinder complex workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources