Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
voice-status-report-mcp-server

voice-status-report-mcp-server

by tomekkorbak
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to voice-status-report-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • oto

      jonymoney
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables text-to-speech conversion using OpenAI's TTS API, with inline audio playback and history within MCP hosts like Claude.
      4 npm
      BSD 3-Clause

    • Text to Speech MCP Server

      JosefGold
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables agents to convert text to speech using OpenAI's TTS models with voice selection, delivery instructions, and queue-based audio playback. Supports both blocking and non-blocking modes for flexible audio generation and playback control.
      3
      BSD 3-Clause

    • agents-voice

      Lolaplex
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to synthesize and play concise spoken summaries of their work through multiple TTS providers, including Azure, OpenRouter, OpenAI, Gemini, ElevenLabs, and local OpenAI-compatible endpoints. It also lets agents stop playback on demand and check which provider, voice, and audio bridge are currently active.
      4
      33 PyPI
      1
      MIT

    • ttsstt-mcp-server

      ptbsare
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables speech-to-text and text-to-speech conversion using OpenAI-compatible APIs. Supports customizable models, voices, and output directories.
      GPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no risk of confusion between tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    With a single tool, naming is trivially consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool is thin for a typical MCP server, but it may be appropriate if the server's scope is limited to providing a summary.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool covers the stated purpose of summarizing actions, but lacks additional voice-related functionality that might be expected (e.g., full report creation or audio control).

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources