Yahoo Mail MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Yahoo Mail MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Yahoo Mail over IMAP+SMTP that enables AI assistants to manage emails fully—listing, reading, searching, threading, flagging, moving, archiving, handling attachments, and sending/reply/forward/draft—using an app-specific password.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables reading, searching, composing, and managing Yahoo Mail emails via IMAP with OAuth support for both local and remote MCP clients.26 npmISC
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables email management (send, read, search, delete, etc.) via IMAP/SMTP, compatible with Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo, iCloud, and other standard mail servers.11MIT
- FlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceProvides full email management for Yahoo Mail via IMAP, including listing, reading, searching, deleting, archiving, and flagging emails.1123-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for cleaning up Yahoo Mail inbox, enabling email management (list, search, delete) from Claude via remote deployment.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA unified MCP server for email access across Gmail, Outlook, iCloud, and generic IMAP providers, enabling search, send, organize, and batch operations.236 npm22MIT
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action or resource: listing, reading, deleting, searching, archiving, moving, and modifying flags/read state. There is no overlap between tool purposes; even paired operations like mark_as_read/mark_as_unread are clearly delineated.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_emails, delete_emails, move_emails) with a few verb_as_adjective variants (mark_as_read, mark_as_unread). The naming is uniform and predictable across the entire set.
With 11 tools, the server provides a focused but comprehensive set of email management operations. The count is well within the ideal range and each tool serves a clear purpose without unnecessary redundancy.
The core email lifecycle (list, read, search, organize, flag, delete) is well covered. Missing send/compose and folder management (create/rename/delete) are notable gaps, but the available operations cover the primary use case of reading and organizing emails.