Yahoo Mail MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Yahoo Mail MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Yahoo Mail over IMAP+SMTP that enables AI assistants to manage emails fully—listing, reading, searching, threading, flagging, moving, archiving, handling attachments, and sending/reply/forward/draft—using an app-specific password.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables reading, searching, composing, and managing Yahoo Mail emails via IMAP with OAuth support for both local and remote MCP clients.24 npmISC
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables email management (send, read, search, delete, etc.) via IMAP/SMTP, compatible with Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo, iCloud, and other standard mail servers.11MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceConnects any MCP client to a Yahoo mailbox over IMAP for reading, searching, organizing, and batch managing messages and folders. It also supports downloading attachments and creating or revising drafts, never sending email.15MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to read, search, and manage a Yahoo Mail mailbox over IMAP and send or forward messages over SMTP, with multiple accounts selectable per call and writes defaulting to drafts, trash, or dry-runs until explicitly confirmed.13MIT
- FlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceProvides full email management for Yahoo Mail via IMAP, including listing, reading, searching, deleting, archiving, and flagging emails.1126-
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action or resource: listing, reading, deleting, searching, archiving, moving, and modifying flags/read state. There is no overlap between tool purposes; even paired operations like mark_as_read/mark_as_unread are clearly delineated.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_emails, delete_emails, move_emails) with a few verb_as_adjective variants (mark_as_read, mark_as_unread). The naming is uniform and predictable across the entire set.
With 11 tools, the server provides a focused but comprehensive set of email management operations. The count is well within the ideal range and each tool serves a clear purpose without unnecessary redundancy.
The core email lifecycle (list, read, search, organize, flag, delete) is well covered. Missing send/compose and folder management (create/rename/delete) are notable gaps, but the available operations cover the primary use case of reading and organizing emails.