tokportal_get_video_analytics

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is clear. The description adds no extra behavioral context beyond what annotations provide (e.g., no mention of rate limits, response format, or data freshness). Since annotations carry the burden, a 3 is appropriate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single four-word sentence, which is very concise and front-loaded. However, it sacrifices informativeness for brevity—it does not explain what 'analytics' includes or how it differs from similar tools. Adequate conciseness but not optimal structure for an agent to act on.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and 65+ sibling tools (including many analytics variants), the description is too brief to provide complete context. It does not describe the return value structure, which parameters affect results, or how this tool fits into the analytics workflow. Adequate for a simple fetch, but insufficient given the ecosystem.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with the single 'id' parameter having a description 'Video ID.' The tool description 'Get single video analytics.' adds no additional meaning or constraints for the parameter beyond what the schema already conveys. Baseline 3 for full schema coverage with no extra value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get single video analytics.' clarifies the tool retrieves analytics for a single video, which is slightly more specific than the name. However, it does not differentiate from sibling analytics tools like 'tokportal_get_account_analytics' (account-level) or 'tokportal_list_account_video_analytics' (list vs single). It lacks a clear verb-resource distinction with context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidance is provided. The description does not indicate when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., tokportal_list_account_video_analytics for listing, or tokportal_get_analytics_dashboard for aggregated views). There is no mention of prerequisites or context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.