tools_remotion_src_explainer_tokens

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations and the description gives no behavioral info: it doesn't state if the tool is read-only, what it returns, or any side effects. The agent has no clue about its behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short (one sentence) but wastes space on file paths without explaining what the tool does. It is not front-loaded with actionable information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description should explain input format, examples, and output. It fails to provide any meaningful context for an agent to use it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage of 'args' is 100% but the description adds zero context. It doesn't explain key-value pairs or expected keys, so the agent gets no extra value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description mentions 'Source of truth' and file paths but lacks a verb indicating what the tool does (e.g., read, transform, explain). The purpose is vague despite the name hinting at token explanation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings like brand_geometry or layout. No context or alternatives provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.