Figma MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Figma MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that connects AI tools and LLMs to Figma designs, enabling them to extract design data, analyze design systems, and generate development documentation.1,704 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProfessional Model Context Protocol server that enables AI-optimized Figma design analysis and comprehensive design-to-code conversion through a structured 5-step workflow.31 npm27MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceGives AI-powered coding tools like Cursor, Windsurf, and Cline access to Figma design files, enabling more accurate code generation directly from Figma designs.42,339 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables seamless interaction with Figma via the Model Context Protocol, allowing LLM applications to access, manipulate, and track Figma files, components, and variables.21,704 npm150MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that integrates Figma design files with AI coding tools like Cursor, Windsurf, and Cline, allowing AI tools to access and understand Figma design data for generating more accurate code.148 npm31MIT
- FlicenseDqualityDmaintenanceA tool that integrates Figma with Cursor through the Model Context Protocol, allowing users to retrieve, optimize, and convert design data from Figma files into structured CSS and design tokens.1-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one fetches an image of a Figma node, while the other generates pseudo-code from a Figma frame. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their functions, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool based on the task.
The tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (fetch_figma_node_image, generate_pseudo_code_from_figma_frame), but there is a minor deviation in verb tense ('fetches' vs 'generates') and slight length variation. Overall, the naming is predictable and readable, with only small inconsistencies.
With only two tools, the server feels thin and under-scoped for a Figma integration. While the tools cover image fetching and code generation, a Figma MCP server would typically benefit from more operations, such as listing files, accessing design properties, or managing comments, making this set incomplete for the domain.
The tool surface is significantly incomplete for a Figma server. It lacks basic CRUD operations like listing files or nodes, updating designs, or accessing metadata. The two tools provided are useful but do not cover core workflows, leaving obvious gaps that could cause agent failures in common Figma-related tasks.