Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to codemagic-mcp-server

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    A local Python MCP server that exposes the Codemagic CI/CD REST API as Claude-callable tools. Trigger builds, manage apps, download artifacts, and clear caches — all from Claude Code or Claude Desktop without leaving the chat.
    25
    2
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server for the Codemagic CI/CD API, enabling app management, build operations, artifact handling, cache control, and team management through natural language.
    4 npm
    3
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    This MCP server enables users to manage Codemagic CI/CD builds directly from Claude Code, including listing apps, triggering builds, checking status, and canceling builds.
    6
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    An MCP server that lets AI agents drive App Store Connect, Google Play Console, and Expo EAS end to end — builds, listings, screenshots, privacy labels, in-app purchases, review submission and even replying to App Review. It automates roughly 60 tools so an app can go from a build to 'Waiting for Review' without clicking through two consoles.
    60
    18
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server that provides AI agents with tools to build, deploy, and manage Flutter applications, including APK/AAB generation, keystore management, and CI/CD integration.
    4 npm
    1
    MIT

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Scored across 63 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (e.g., add vs. delete vs. list for each resource), but the sheer number (63) creates subtle overlap risk (e.g., multiple upload tools for different stores).

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., add_application, get_build_logs, promote_google_play_release). No mixing of conventions.

Tool Count2/5

63 tools is excessively high for a single server, far beyond the 3–15 range for well-scoped sets. Many niche tools (e.g., set_android_data_safety) contribute to bloat, making agent navigation difficult.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers the full mobile CI/CD lifecycle (build, test, deploy, manage store listings) with only minor gaps (e.g., no delete_application or list TestFlight testers). Agents can work around these.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues