Skip to main content
Glama
tobioffice

SearXNG MCP Server

by tobioffice
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to SearXNG MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-searxng

      atomlong
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that integrates the SearXNG API for web search and URL content extraction with advanced features like pagination, caching, and proxy support.
      4
      10,090 npm
      2
      MIT

    • SearXNG MCP Server

      aicrafted
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables web search capabilities by integrating with a SearXNG instance to aggregate results from over 130 engines. It allows users to perform filtered searches across categories like news, science, and social media while supporting advanced parameters for language and time range.
      11
      MIT

    • scrapesearch-mcp

      tonmoy-dhroubo
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides web search scraping from DuckDuckGo (with Mojeek fallback) and URL content fetching as markdown/text or raw HTML.
      1
      -

    • Basic MCP Tools

      Tyguy047
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A self-hosted MCP server providing private web search, web page fetching, and current date/time tools, powered by a bundled SearXNG instance for API-key-free local search.
      2
      -
    Deploy Server
    Let your AI agent see the webWeb-to-screenshot MCP for Claude, Cursor and Codex. No cookie banners. Free to start.snap-render.comAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: searxng_web_search performs web searches to find URLs, while web_url_read reads content from specific URLs. There is no overlap or ambiguity between searching for information and retrieving content from a known URL.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tools use snake_case naming, which is consistent. However, the naming patterns differ slightly: searxng_web_search includes the server prefix and specifies the action (search), while web_url_read is more generic. This minor deviation prevents a perfect score.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only two tools, the server feels under-scoped for a web search and content retrieval domain. While the tools cover basic search and reading, there are likely missing operations such as filtering search results, handling pagination, or advanced URL processing, making the count too low for comprehensive functionality.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set is severely incomplete for a web search server. It lacks essential operations like refining searches (e.g., by date, site, or type), managing search sessions, or handling errors and rate limits. Agents will face dead ends when trying to perform more complex web research tasks beyond basic search and URL reading.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources