set_fermentation_chamber_mode_switch_delay

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It simply states 'Set' and the valid range, but does not disclose any side effects, whether the change takes effect immediately, permissions required, or the result of invalid input. This adds little beyond what the schema already conveys, such as the 2–30 minute range.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences that immediately state the action and the valid range. It is front-loaded with the purpose and contains no unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter setter with no output schema, the description is adequate but not rich. It explains what is set and the range, but does not explain the operational effect of the mode switch delay (e.g., preventing rapid cycling) or what happens after setting it. This leaves gaps for an agent trying to understand the tool's impact.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema describes both parameters with 100% coverage: minutes has the range description and chamber_id is a UUID. The description repeats the range but does not add any additional meaning beyond the schema. This aligns with the baseline of 3 given the high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Set the heating/cooling mode switch delay in minutes for a fermentation chamber,' which is a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling setters like set_fermentation_chamber_temperature and set_fermentation_chamber_compressor_delay by naming the exact setting.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context for when to use the tool: when you need to adjust the mode switch delay of a fermentation chamber. It does not explicitly list exclusions or alternatives, but the sibling tool names make it obvious this is the dedicated setter for this parameter.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.