Skip to main content
Glama
tobiasGuta

PrecisionPDF-MCP

by tobiasGuta

Related Servers

Alternatives to PrecisionPDF-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables safe interaction with PDFs, including listing files, extracting highlights with exact text, reading annotations and page text, and viewing metadata, all restricted to configured directories.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to inspect and work with PDF files entirely on the local machine, covering page counts, metadata, layout, encryption permissions, scan-vs-text detection, and page rendering. Generated results land in a temporary workspace as short artifact ids that can be chained between tools and exported to real folders on request.
      12
      45 PyPI
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables clients to inspect local PDFs by searching text, rendering pages, and cropping selected regions at high resolution directly from the source document. It runs locally over stdio without requiring models, embeddings, GPUs, or API keys, and does not modify source PDFs or send network requests.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to open local PDFs and edit existing text, images, annotations and form fields in place using the document's own embedded fonts, baselines and colours, with undo/redo and page rendering for visual checks. It also exposes 67 whole-document tools such as merge, split, compress, OCR, redact, sign, compare, watermark and conversion to and from PDF, all running locally over stdio.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, and the propose_/apply_ pairing cleanly separates preview from committed edits (highlight, update, removal). Read/list/render tools (list_pdfs, read_pdf_page, render_pdf_page, list_annotations) target different resource aspects with no overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_pdfs, read_pdf_page, propose_highlight, apply_annotation_update, etc.). The propose_*/apply_* convention is applied uniformly across the three annotation operations.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well within the ideal range and each earns its place, covering discovery, reading, rendering, and the full propose/apply lifecycle without redundancy.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the full highlight lifecycle (create/update/remove) via paired propose/apply tools, plus listing PDFs, reading text, rendering for review, and listing annotations. No obvious gaps for a local PDF annotation workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues