arch-cursor-plugin
Related Servers
Alternatives to arch-cursor-plugin
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables code review through Cursor CLI integration with GPT-5. Provides a cursor.review tool that executes code reviews and returns structured JSON results with automatic audit logging.2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables agents to submit proposed actions against governed domain text and receive proceed, escalate, or block decisions, with persisted review-queue handling over stdio JSON-RPC.1MIT

bounty-operatorofficial
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceConnects MCP clients to pre-submission review that argues against a draft bug-bounty report or smart-contract finding the way a triager would, tying every claim to a supplied file and line and returning a submit, rewrite-then-submit, prove-first, hold-duplicate or drop verdict. Exposes tools to list review profiles, prepare reviews for the agent's own model, build hash-verified review packets, and — with a connection token — run hosted profiles on your own provider key.65MIT- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents to submit markdown for human review, track feedback, and apply revisions through an HTTP API with an optional MCP wrapper.212Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceExposes CodeRabbit IDE review comments as MCP tools and resources, allowing scanning, listing, and managing comments from clients like Cursor.5 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP bridge from OpenCode to Cursor agent CLI, enabling code review, debugging, and planning via Cursor cloud.7 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: arch_review performs theological review, while kjv_lookup retrieves KJV verse text offline. Their descriptions explicitly cross-reference each other and state when not to use each tool.
Both names use lowercase snake_case with a source/namespace prefix followed by an action: arch_review and kjv_lookup. The pattern is predictable and consistent.
Two tools is slightly thin, but each covers a distinct, essential operation for this focused plugin. Neither feels redundant or unnecessary.
The core review and lookup workflows are covered, including error behavior and billing notes. Minor gaps exist around review history or broader Scripture search, but agents can work around them for the stated scope.