swarmtrade_subscribe_notifications

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It states subscription options and triggers (trade state changes) but omits details like persistence, unsubscription methods, rate limits, or payload format. The HMAC mention is from the schema, not the description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description consists of two concise sentences with no redundancy. Every word contributes to clarity, making it easy to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a subscription tool with optional parameters and no output schema, the description lacks critical details: whether both webhook and email can be used together, how to manage subscriptions, error handling, and confirmation of successful subscription. These gaps reduce completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema parameter descriptions cover all three parameters (webhook_url, email, events), providing 100% coverage. The description adds no new meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'subscribe', the resource 'trade event notifications', and the mechanisms 'webhook or email'. It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools, which focus on executing or querying trades and escrow operations, not notifications.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for being notified of trade state changes, but does not explicitly contrast with alternatives or state when not to use it. Since no other notification tool exists, guidance is adequate but minimal.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.