analyze_ichimoku_snapshot

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the tool returns only the latest values, which is a behavioral trait. However, it does not mention other behaviors such as read-only nature, authorization requirements, rate limits, or data source accuracy.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, consisting of two sentences and a warning note. It avoids unnecessary text, though the lack of parameter descriptions is a trade-off. The structure is acceptable for its brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of Ichimoku indicators and the absence of an output schema or parameter documentation, the description is incomplete. It does not explain how to interpret the returned values or configure the parameters for meaningful analysis, leaving gaps for an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain any of the four parameters (pair, type, limit, lookback). Users are left to infer their meanings from parameter names alone, which is insufficient for correct usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it provides a numerical snapshot of Ichimoku Cloud indicators, including price, cloud position, tenkan-kijun cross, and cloud slope. It distinguishes from a related sibling tool (prepare_chart_data) explicitly, but does not differentiate from other analyze_* siblings beyond the name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description notes that it provides latest values only and suggests using prepare_chart_data for time series charting. However, it does not provide guidance on when to use this tool versus other similar snapshot tools (e.g., analyze_bb_snapshot), nor does it mention prerequisites or constraints.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.