Skip to main content
Glama
@jam-jam/convert-mcp

@jam-jam/convert-mcp

by titouannwtt

List the audio analysis queue

jj_queue_list

Lists your audio analysis jobs grouped as active, queued, and done from the last seven days to check processing status and service queue rank.

Instructions

Lists the caller's audio analysis jobs in three groups (GET /queue): "active" (running), "queued" (waiting, with "rank" = real service order) and "done" (finished, failed or cancelled in the last 7 days). Needs an account and the queue:read scope. Costs no quota.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "jj_queue_list"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.3.2

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden and does well: it explains the three result groups, clarifies that 'rank' is real service order, and bounds 'done' to the last 7 days. It also discloses prerequisites (account plus queue:read scope) and cost (no quota), which are genuinely useful traits. It omits any polling/refresh or pagination behavior, keeping it from a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One dense but well-structured sentence set, front-loaded with the verb and resource, then the group breakdown, then prerequisites and cost. Every clause adds information; the nested quoting of group names is slightly heavy but functional.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a parameterless read tool with no output schema, the description must convey the return shape, and it does so by enumerating the three groups and what each contains. Missing details are limits on volume/ordering across groups, which would matter for an agent planning to page through results.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate. Baseline for a parameterless tool is 4, and the schema confirms an empty object.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb and resource ('Lists the caller's audio analysis jobs') and even names the backing endpoint (GET /queue). It does not explicitly distinguish itself from other job-listing siblings such as jj_ai_music_history or jj_stems_list_jobs, so it lands at 4 rather than 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied rather than stated: an agent can infer this is the tool to see the current audio analysis queue. There is no explicit when-to-use/when-not guidance and no reference to alternatives like jj_queue_get_job for a single job, so it is adequate but with a clear gap.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.