hid.release_all

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. States it releases all held keys/buttons, implying immediate effect. Does not mention behavior when nothing is held or any side effects. Adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences – a general usage prefix and the specific action. The prefix is somewhat boilerplate but concise overall. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no parameters or output schema, the description is sufficient to understand what the tool does. Sibling tools provide context. Could mention if it affects all HID devices or just current device, but not critical.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters in schema. Description adds no param info, but none is needed. Baseline for 0-param tool is 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Release every held key / mouse button (panic stop)' – a specific verb+resource. Distinguishes from siblings like hid.key_release (specific key) and hid.hold_key (hold action).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Includes a general prefix recommending HID input when other automation paths fail or user requests physical input. For this tool, the name and description imply use as a panic stop, but no explicit when-to-use vs alternatives or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.