Skip to main content
Glama

scenario_create

Consolidate five or more related memory atoms into a single high-signal scenario summary, cutting recall cost from many tokens to roughly one hundred. Write the summary yourself to preserve the key insight.

Instructions

Consolidate multiple L1 atoms into an L2 scenario summary. Call this when you have 5+ atoms about the same topic — it creates a high-signal summary that recall injects in ~100 tokens instead of 5+ individual atoms. No LLM needed — you write the summary yourself based on the atoms you've seen.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
summaryYesA 1-3 sentence summary that captures the key insight from these atoms. Write it as a self-contained fact useful on its own.
task_idNoThe task ID. Use this to isolate memory by a specific task. Link captures to a task for finer isolation.
team_idNoThe team ID. Use this to isolate memory by team. When set, all queries filter by this value.
user_idNoThe user ID. Use this to isolate memory by user within a team. When set with team_id, queries filter by both.
agent_idNoThe agent ID. Use this to isolate memory by agent role within a team. Defaults to the detected agent.
atom_idsYesThe L1 atom IDs to consolidate (1-20).
persona_tagsNoOptional tags for categorization (e.g., ['database', 'migration']).
Install Server

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description mentions that a summary is created and that recall will inject it later, implying a write operation. However, it does not disclose any side effects (e.g., overwriting, storage details) or whether the tool is read-only or mutating beyond 'creates'. Since no annotations are provided, the description carries the burden, but it remains incomplete regarding exact behavioral guarantees.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, concise and well-organized. It covers the action, condition, benefit, and a critical behavioral note (user writes summary), with no redundant or ambiguous wording.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the schema covers all inputs and the description explains when and how to use the tool, the overall context is complete. The lack of an output schema is acceptable as it's a creation tool, and the description does not need to explain return values. The mention of 'recall injects' provides integration context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides detailed descriptions for all parameters (100% coverage), including the purpose of atom_ids and summary, and the optional persona_tags. The description reinforces the usage context without contradicting the schema, ensuring parameter meanings are clear.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (consolidate), resource (L1 atoms into L2 scenario summary), and the condition (5+ atoms about the same topic). It also distinguishes the tool by mentioning the benefit over individual atoms and the lack of LLM dependency, making the purpose unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly provides a usage condition ('Call this when you have 5+ atoms') and clarifies that the user writes the summary themselves rather than expecting LLM generation. This directly guides when and how to invoke the tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tinhien11/remem-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server