A
licenseA
qualityC
maintenanceProvides AI coding agents with a local, Markdown-first shared memory, enabling them to record decisions, failures, progress, and handoffs and retrieve them across sessions via MCP tools.
8
MIT
Baton
by timurabi3
Related Servers
Alternatives to Baton
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible coding agents to persist and retrieve durable project context—such as decisions, preferences, issues, tasks, and notes—locally across sessions without cloud services.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables Cursor agents and subagents to share persistent, human-readable coordination state across sessions via MCP, allowing explicit cross-session context handoff without bloating the main conversation.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides AI coding agents with shared project memory, compact evidence-first context, status checks, durable handoffs, and encrypted cross-device checkpoints through MCP.1AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to maintain project continuity through a file-based state hub with tasks, phases, and handoff snapshots. Provides MCP tools for reading and updating project state, with gatekeeping enforced via real-state evaluation and per-tool authorization.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides operational continuity for AI coding agents, preserving task state, decisions, checkpoints, and project context across sessions and model switches via MCP.1Apache 2.0
TDQS
A3.7/5.0
Scored across 6 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools map to a distinct step in the handoff workflow with clear usage cues. status, history, and pick_up all expose handoff information at different levels of detail, so there is minor potential for confusion among the read-focused tools.
Naming Consistency4/5
All tools share the baton_ prefix and use snake_case, which makes the set feel coherent. The mix of verb-like names (pick_up, pass, log, init) and noun-like names (status, history) is a small inconsistency, but the pattern remains predictable.
Tool Count5/5
Six tools is well-scoped for a handoff utility: setup, status check, pick-up, history, progress logging, and passing cover the workflow without unnecessary bloat.
Completeness4/5
The core lifecycle is covered: initialize, check, pick up, log progress, and pass the baton. The main gap is the lack of a reset, clear, or discard operation for ending or resetting a handoff state.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues