andy
Related Servers
Alternatives to andy
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to learn from their work by recording tasks, extracting patterns, detecting mistakes, and proactively surfacing insights, all using the agent's own model through a cooperative intelligence pattern.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to persist and recall episodic memories across sessions, consolidating experiences into reusable rules and lessons to reduce repeated mistakes and improve task performance.1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables programming agents to capture errors and conversation signals, reflect on root causes, consolidate reusable skills, and retrieve relevant context for future tasks, providing a self-learning memory loop.15MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceSaves decisions, rules, bugs, to-dos and failed approaches from coding-agent chats as lines in a repo file, then brings the relevant ones back in later sessions. It also checks planned commands and file edits against those saved rules before they run, asking first when a rule might be broken.169 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceSelf-learning memory for AI coding agents. Observes tool sequences, user preferences, and recurring fixes — auto-promotes high-confidence patterns into behavioral rules. 22 tools, 2 prompts, SQLite-backed, zero config.232MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables coding assistants to persist decisions, rules, bugs, to-dos and dead ends from chat sessions into a repository memory file, then automatically recall the relevant ones in later sessions. It also checks pending commands and file edits against those saved rules before they run, flagging possible violations.169 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: apply_customization saves, list_customizations lists names, read_customization reads content, and write_proposal writes a separate proposal file. No two tools are ambiguous.
All tools follow a verb_noun pattern, but there is a minor pluralization inconsistency (list_customizations vs. singular other tools) and the noun changes from 'customization' to 'proposal'. Overall mostly consistent.
With 4 tools, the count is well-scoped for the domain of managing customizations and proposals. Each tool serves a necessary function without unnecessary duplication.
The toolset covers create/read/update for customizations but lacks a delete tool. Additionally, there is no tool to read or list proposals, only to write them. These gaps are notable but manageable.