Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to andy

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to learn from their work by recording tasks, extracting patterns, detecting mistakes, and proactively surfacing insights, all using the agent's own model through a cooperative intelligence pattern.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables programming agents to capture errors and conversation signals, reflect on root causes, consolidate reusable skills, and retrieve relevant context for future tasks, providing a self-learning memory loop.
      15
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Self-learning memory for AI coding agents. Observes tool sequences, user preferences, and recurring fixes — auto-promotes high-confidence patterns into behavioral rules. 22 tools, 2 prompts, SQLite-backed, zero config.
      23
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides coding agents with durable, cross-session lessons-learned memory, enforcing that success or failure verdicts can only come from human approval, human correction, or objective metrics—never from the agent itself.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to persist and recall project-specific conventions, prohibitions, and repair lessons locally, with approved rule injection before tasks and no external API calls.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: apply_customization saves, list_customizations lists names, read_customization reads content, and write_proposal writes a separate proposal file. No two tools are ambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools follow a verb_noun pattern, but there is a minor pluralization inconsistency (list_customizations vs. singular other tools) and the noun changes from 'customization' to 'proposal'. Overall mostly consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 4 tools, the count is well-scoped for the domain of managing customizations and proposals. Each tool serves a necessary function without unnecessary duplication.

    Completeness3/5

    The toolset covers create/read/update for customizations but lacks a delete tool. Additionally, there is no tool to read or list proposals, only to write them. These gaps are notable but manageable.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues