andy
Related Servers
Alternatives to andy
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to learn from their work by recording tasks, extracting patterns, detecting mistakes, and proactively surfacing insights, all using the agent's own model through a cooperative intelligence pattern.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to persist and recall episodic memories across sessions, consolidating experiences into reusable rules and lessons to reduce repeated mistakes and improve task performance.1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables programming agents to capture errors and conversation signals, reflect on root causes, consolidate reusable skills, and retrieve relevant context for future tasks, providing a self-learning memory loop.15MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceSelf-learning memory for AI coding agents. Observes tool sequences, user preferences, and recurring fixes — auto-promotes high-confidence patterns into behavioral rules. 22 tools, 2 prompts, SQLite-backed, zero config.232MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides coding agents with durable, cross-session lessons-learned memory, enforcing that success or failure verdicts can only come from human approval, human correction, or objective metrics—never from the agent itself.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding assistants to persist and recall project-specific conventions, prohibitions, and repair lessons locally, with approved rule injection before tasks and no external API calls.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: apply_customization saves, list_customizations lists names, read_customization reads content, and write_proposal writes a separate proposal file. No two tools are ambiguous.
All tools follow a verb_noun pattern, but there is a minor pluralization inconsistency (list_customizations vs. singular other tools) and the noun changes from 'customization' to 'proposal'. Overall mostly consistent.
With 4 tools, the count is well-scoped for the domain of managing customizations and proposals. Each tool serves a necessary function without unnecessary duplication.
The toolset covers create/read/update for customizations but lacks a delete tool. Additionally, there is no tool to read or list proposals, only to write them. These gaps are notable but manageable.