Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Linear MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to interact with Linear's issue tracking system, including creating, updating, searching issues, adding comments, and accessing resources via the Linear API.
      734 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with Linear workspaces by listing, retrieving, creating, and searching issues, and listing teams via the Linear GraphQL API.
      2 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive issue tracking and project management through Linear's GraphQL API. Supports creating and managing issues, organizing projects and sprints, team collaboration, and roadmap planning for modern development workflows.
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables reading and managing Linear issues by human-readable ID, with tools for searching, creating, updating, commenting, and resolving teams, states, labels, and assignees by name.
      11
      -

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes targeting specific resources and actions, but there is some overlap between linear_create_issue and linear_create_issues, and between linear_delete_issue and linear_delete_issues, which could cause confusion about when to use the singular vs. plural versions. The descriptions clarify the bulk operations, but the naming similarity still creates minor ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent snake_case naming pattern with a 'linear_' prefix and clear verb_noun structure (e.g., linear_create_issue, linear_search_issues). The naming is highly predictable and uniform across all 13 tools, making it easy for agents to understand and use them.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 13 tools, the server is well-scoped for managing Linear issues, projects, teams, and users, covering core operations like CRUD, search, and bulk actions. Each tool appears to earn its place without feeling bloated or insufficient for the domain of project management and issue tracking.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset provides strong coverage for issue and project management, including CRUD operations, search, and bulk actions, with no major dead ends. However, there are minor gaps, such as missing update operations for projects or teams, and no tools for managing issue comments or attachments, which could limit some workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues