Skip to main content
Glama
timmKal01

ke-tenders-audit-mcp

by timmKal01

Related Servers

Alternatives to ke-tenders-audit-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables procurement officers and MCP clients to ingest tender and bid documents, run cited multi-agent evaluations with scores and risk flags, and review audit trails while preventing AI from recording award decisions.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables automated forensic auditing of public procurement tenders by parsing RFQ specifications, detecting price drift against market baselines, flagging bidder collusion risks, and enforcing human officer approval before any decision is recorded.
      7,661 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to search and analyze US federal procurement data across SAM.gov opportunities, FPDS awards, SAM entities, FFATA subawards, exclusions, and full-text solicitation attachments, with 6 tools for market research, opportunity discovery, teaming, pricing, and compliance.
      6
      44 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to find, score, and monitor government contract opportunities across UK, EU, and US with AI-powered relevance scoring.
      2
      103 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables searching and analyzing government tenders, contract awards, and pre-tender pipelines from 21 official sources, with tools for tender search, award intelligence, and detailed notice retrieval.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables evaluation of synthetic tender requirements against supplier evidence by loading tenders, building compliance matrices, flagging unresolved risks, and preparing draft evidence packs with preserved provenance. Finalization stays blocked behind a mandatory human approval gate, so no award decision is made autonomously.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action: search, benchmark, profile, flag detection, flag filing, and reporting. There is mild overlap between price_benchmark and check_red_flags (both analyze award patterns) and between supplier_profile and check_red_flags, but the descriptions make the boundaries reasonably clear.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Four tools follow a verb-first pattern (search_awards, check_red_flags, file_flag, draft_report), while price_benchmark and supplier_profile use a noun-first pattern. Readable overall, but the convention is mixed rather than predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for an audit workflow spanning discovery, analysis, flagging, and reporting. It is on the leaner side but each tool clearly earns its place; no redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full audit lifecycle: find awards, benchmark prices, profile suppliers, detect red flags, file flags, and produce a report. A detail-retrieval tool (e.g. get_award/get_tender by ocid) is a minor gap, but agents can work around it via search.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues