ke-tenders-audit-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to ke-tenders-audit-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents to search and analyze US federal procurement data across SAM.gov opportunities, FPDS awards, SAM entities, FFATA subawards, exclusions, and full-text solicitation attachments, with 53 tools for market research, opportunity discovery, teaming, pricing, and compliance.5331 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to find, score, and monitor government contract opportunities across UK, EU, and US with AI-powered relevance scoring.249 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables searching and analyzing government tenders, contract awards, and pre-tender pipelines from 21 official sources, with tools for tender search, award intelligence, and detailed notice retrieval.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceConnects AI assistants and agents with the Dominican Republic's public procurement transactional portal and open data API, enabling searches of tenders, contracts, bids, and suppliers, plus legal threshold calculations, proposal drafting, scoring simulations, collusion auditing, and institutional scorecards.13MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables querying international public procurement data, including government tenders, through the Open Contracting standard.399 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI agents structured access to Public Procurement Registry data, allowing natural language queries for planned procurements, open tenders, contract awards, buyers, and winning suppliers.-
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action: search, benchmark, profile, flag detection, flag filing, and reporting. There is mild overlap between price_benchmark and check_red_flags (both analyze award patterns) and between supplier_profile and check_red_flags, but the descriptions make the boundaries reasonably clear.
Four tools follow a verb-first pattern (search_awards, check_red_flags, file_flag, draft_report), while price_benchmark and supplier_profile use a noun-first pattern. Readable overall, but the convention is mixed rather than predictable.
Six tools is well-scoped for an audit workflow spanning discovery, analysis, flagging, and reporting. It is on the leaner side but each tool clearly earns its place; no redundancy.
The surface covers the full audit lifecycle: find awards, benchmark prices, profile suppliers, detect red flags, file flags, and produce a report. A detail-retrieval tool (e.g. get_award/get_tender by ocid) is a minor gap, but agents can work around it via search.