Skip to main content
Glama
timmKal01

ke-tenders-audit-mcp

by timmKal01

Related Servers

Alternatives to ke-tenders-audit-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to search and analyze US federal procurement data across SAM.gov opportunities, FPDS awards, SAM entities, FFATA subawards, exclusions, and full-text solicitation attachments, with 53 tools for market research, opportunity discovery, teaming, pricing, and compliance.
      53
      31 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to find, score, and monitor government contract opportunities across UK, EU, and US with AI-powered relevance scoring.
      2
      49 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables searching and analyzing government tenders, contract awards, and pre-tender pipelines from 21 official sources, with tools for tender search, award intelligence, and detailed notice retrieval.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants and agents with the Dominican Republic's public procurement transactional portal and open data API, enabling searches of tenders, contracts, bids, and suppliers, plus legal threshold calculations, proposal drafting, scoring simulations, collusion auditing, and institutional scorecards.
      13
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives AI agents structured access to Public Procurement Registry data, allowing natural language queries for planned procurements, open tenders, contract awards, buyers, and winning suppliers.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action: search, benchmark, profile, flag detection, flag filing, and reporting. There is mild overlap between price_benchmark and check_red_flags (both analyze award patterns) and between supplier_profile and check_red_flags, but the descriptions make the boundaries reasonably clear.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Four tools follow a verb-first pattern (search_awards, check_red_flags, file_flag, draft_report), while price_benchmark and supplier_profile use a noun-first pattern. Readable overall, but the convention is mixed rather than predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for an audit workflow spanning discovery, analysis, flagging, and reporting. It is on the leaner side but each tool clearly earns its place; no redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full audit lifecycle: find awards, benchmark prices, profile suppliers, detect red flags, file flags, and produce a report. A detail-retrieval tool (e.g. get_award/get_tender by ocid) is a minor gap, but agents can work around it via search.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues