switchyard
Related Servers
Alternatives to switchyard
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables a primary AI coding assistant to delegate tasks to multiple specialized CLI agents (such as Gemini, Claude, Codex, and Cursor) in parallel from a single prompt, sharing project context across all of them. It aggregates their outputs into one synthesized response while relying on the user's existing CLI tools and subscriptions.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables a primary AI coding assistant to delegate tasks to specialized sub-agents in parallel, share project context, and synthesize their responses. It uses existing local CLI tools and API subscriptions to coordinate Codex, Claude, Cursor, and Gemini without extra cost.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables multiple AI coding CLIs (Claude Code, Gemini/Antigravity, Codex, and OpenCode) to collaborate as a coordinated team by routing cross-agent prompts, sharing messages and review tickets, tracking tasks on a shared store, and isolating each agent in its own Git worktree with turn-budget safeguards—all inspectable and steerable from a local web dashboard.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables a primary AI coding assistant to delegate tasks in parallel to specialized CLI-based agents such as Gemini, Claude, Codex, and Cursor, sharing the same project context across all of them. It then aggregates and synthesizes their outputs into a single response, using existing local tools and subscriptions with no extra configuration.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceRoutes coding tasks to local and remote LLMs with intelligent cost-quality optimization, supports benchmarking and code search.43ISC
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables users to delegate tasks from a single prompt in their IDE to multiple specialized AI coding assistants such as Gemini, Claude, Codex, and Cursor, which run in parallel with shared project context. Aggregates and synthesizes their responses into one unified answer, using existing CLI tools and API subscriptions without extra cost.-
TDQS
Scored across 55 tools
Multiple tools are direct aliases (e.g., approval_queue_list vs agent_queue_list), and several planning tools (plan_task, decompose_task, fleet_plan) have overlapping purposes with only subtle differences, creating confusion for agent selection.
Most tools use snake_case but follow inconsistent patterns: some are verb_noun (inspect_status, list_subtasks), others are noun_verb (tune_show, memory_list), and some are noun_noun_verb (routing_exception_add). No single convention dominates.
With 55 tools, the server is overly large. Many tools are redundant (aliases) or highly specific (e.g., resume_swarm_inspect, apply_preview), which could be consolidated. A more focused set would improve usability.
The server covers a wide range of agent management tasks: planning, execution, learning, caching, routing, workflow, and inspection. Minor gaps may exist (e.g., no generic project CRUD), but core operations are well represented.