Skip to main content
Glama
timescale

Tiger Linear MCP Server

by timescale
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Tiger Linear MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Linear MCP Server

      packetnomad
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides access to Linear's issue tracking system through a standardized Model Context Protocol interface, allowing users to create, update, search, and manage issues, projects, and comments via natural language.
      330 npm
      1
      MIT

    • Linear MCP Integration Server

      skspade
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI models to interact with Linear for issue tracking and project management through the Model Context Protocol, supporting capabilities like creating issues, searching, managing sprints, and bulk updating statuses.
      5
      -

    • Linear MCP Server

      veddnd
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to interact with Linear's issue tracking system, including creating, updating, searching issues, adding comments, and accessing resources via the Linear API.
      687 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and granularity: single issue, list of issues, all users, and all projects. There is no overlap or ambiguity between singular and plural forms.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the consistent 'get_<resource>' pattern, making the API intuitive and predictable. No mixed conventions or vague verbs.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each tool earns its place by covering the core read operations for issues, users, and projects. The count feels appropriate for a focused read-only server.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is read-only only, with no create, update, or delete operations for issues or other resources. For a Linear server, there are also missing common resources like teams and cycles, leaving significant gaps for any agent needing to manage workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources