Skip to main content
Glama
tim-akkio

MCP Server Framework

by tim-akkio

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Server Framework

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A general-purpose MCP server with utility tools including datetime information, safe math calculations, text statistics, JSON extraction, knowledge base search, and HTTP GET requests. It demonstrates server-side MCP implementation and can be connected to Claude Desktop or LangGraph agents.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A simple MCP server that provides basic utility tools for text manipulation, file operations, and calculations, intended to be connected to Claude AI desktop app.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server built with the mcp-framework for developing and managing custom tools. It provides a structured foundation for building and integrating modular components like data processors and API clients into Claude Desktop.
      5 npm
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that allows integration with Claude Desktop by creating and managing custom tools that can be executed through the MCP framework.
      67 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that provides AI assistants with tools for file system management, Git integration, and shell command execution. It features specialized code utilities for analysis, formatting, and linting to enhance development workflows within Claude Desktop.
      28
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server with 30+ custom tools organized into categories: date/time operations, file management, system information, text processing, and web operations. Enables async communication with robust error handling and flexible CLI integration.
      31
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap between time-related tools. get_current_time, get_timestamp, and parse_timestamp all handle time data, which could cause confusion about which to use for specific scenarios. However, their descriptions clarify their differences: get_current_time returns formatted UTC, get_timestamp returns Unix seconds, and parse_timestamp converts Unix to formatted. The echo variants are clearly distinct in their transformations.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with clear verb_noun structures. Examples include echo_reverse, get_allowed_paths, list_directory, and parse_timestamp. There are no deviations in naming conventions, making the set predictable and easy to understand at a glance.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 11 tools, the count is reasonable for a framework server, but it feels slightly over-scoped due to redundancy. The three echo tools and multiple time tools could potentially be consolidated without losing functionality. However, the number is within the typical 3-15 range and covers basic utility operations adequately.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers basic utility functions like echoing, time handling, and file operations, but there are notable gaps. For file operations, it provides get_file_info, list_directory, and read_file, but lacks write, delete, or update capabilities, which are common in file management. The time tools are comprehensive, but the overall domain of 'framework' is vague, making it hard to assess full coverage beyond these utilities.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues