Skip to main content
Glama
tiluckdave

Hound MCP

by tiluckdave
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Hound MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • depguard

      mopanc
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP security server for AI coding agents. 12 tools: pre-install guardian, vulnerability audit, supply-chain attack detection via static code analysis, and CycloneDX 1.6 SBOM generation. Zero runtime dependencies.
      14
      14 npm
      15
      Apache 2.0

    • MCP Shield

      rob925
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Security scanner and MCP server that catches dangerous patterns in MCP servers and AI agent projects, such as leaked secrets, shell execution, and prompt-injection text. Runs as both a CLI and MCP server with CI-friendly severity gates.
      2
      1
      MIT

    • AgentShield

      elliotllliu
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Full-stack security for AI agents — static analysis + MCP runtime interception. 31 rules detect prompt injection, data exfiltration, backdoors, tool poisoning, and cross-file attack chains. Includes MCP proxy for real-time blocking, Python AST taint tracking, multi-language injection detection (8 languages), and AI-powered deep analysis. Free, offline, zero-config.
      129 npm
      15
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: e.g., advisories for details, audit for lockfile scanning, compare for side-by-side, inspect for profile, license_check for compliance, popular for scanning popular packages, preinstall for safety check, score for computation, tree for dependencies, typosquat for name similarity, upgrade for safe version, vulns for listing. No overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the 'hound_' prefix with a descriptive noun or verb-noun compound (e.g., audit, compare, license_check, preinstall, score, tree, typosquat, upgrade, vulns). The pattern is consistent and predictable, aiding agent selection.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools cover the domain of package security and dependency analysis comprehensively without being excessive. Each tool serves a necessary function, and the count is appropriate for the scope.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full lifecycle: advisory retrieval, vulnerability scanning (lockfiles), profiling, comparison, license checking, popular package scanning, pre-install checks, scoring, dependency trees, typosquat detection, upgrade recommendations, and vulnerability listing. No obvious gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessSlow

    Resources