create_site_page_draft

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must carry behavioral disclosure. It states the draft state, which is useful, but it does not explain side effects, whether the draft is saved only, what validation occurs, or any consequences of creation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one short sentence that front-loads the core purpose and state. It contains no filler and efficiently points to a sibling for argument details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 9 parameters, no annotations, and zero schema descriptions, the tool is under-specified. The description lacks parameter meanings, usage guidance, and behavioral details beyond 'DRAFT'. An output schema exists, but it does not compensate for the missing explanatory information.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% for 9 parameters skillfully, and the description does not explain any parameter beyond referencing create_landing_page_draft. This delegation might help if the sibling is known, but it adds no concrete semantics for the current tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create', the resource 'site page', and the state 'DRAFT'. It also points to a sibling tool, create_landing_page_draft, which helps distinguish this tool from closely related creation tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given for when to use this tool vs alternatives like create_landing_page_draft or create_blog_post_draft. The phrase 'Same arguments as create_landing_page_draft' addresses parameter reuse but not usage context or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.