Skip to main content
Glama
tiempor3al

learning-loop-mcp

by tiempor3al

Related Servers

Alternatives to learning-loop-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with persistent, local, and shareable project memory by storing decisions and code context in a searchable SQLite index, supporting keyword and semantic search via MCP.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI coding assistants with persistent project memory to retain architectural decisions, code patterns, and domain knowledge across sessions. It stores data locally in a SQLite database, allowing agents to remember, recall, and manage project-specific context using full-text search.
      3 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides persistent cross-session memory and full-text search for AI coding assistants, storing project context, decisions, and preferences while enabling searchable access to conversation history via local SQLite.
      8
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Provides AI coding agents with persistent, long-term memory through local semantic search and SQLite storage. It enables agents to save and retrieve architectural decisions or project context across different conversation sessions without requiring cloud services.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI coding agents with low-latency project intelligence, including workspace setup, encrypted backups, diagnostics, evolution digests, and cross-project pattern scoring from local SQLite data.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but several pairs overlap in surface intent: amnesia_check vs amnesia_evaluate both concern continuity/Amnesia validation, and learning_context vs search both return lesson-related content. The descriptions help a careful agent differentiate them, but the boundaries are not immediately obvious.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use snake_case and are readable, but the pattern is mixed: some are verb_noun (capture_outcome, register_solution, reindex_solutions), some are noun phrases (learning_status, learning_context, project_preflight), and some are bare words (index, search, solutions). This is not chaotic, but it lacks a consistent convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eleven tools is well within the ideal range for a domain-specific server. Each tool serves a distinct role in the learning-loop lifecycle, and none feel redundant or purely decorative.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers the main learning-loop workflow: preflight, outcome capture, Amnesia validation, indexing, solution registration, status, and retrieval. Minor gaps exist—such as no explicit promotion tool or lesson deletion—but these may be intentional given the append-only and forward-only design.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues