Skip to main content
Glama
tiagoyamashita

openlinkedinmcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to openlinkedinmcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for programmable LinkedIn automation via Playwright, offering 20 tools for profile management, messaging, feed interaction, and job searching through real browser automation.
      11 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for LinkedIn automation that enables users to search for jobs, retrieve profile details, manage connections, and read or send messages. It leverages Playwright and Browserbase to interact with LinkedIn through an existing authenticated browser session.
      6
      6 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for automating LinkedIn actions such as reading feeds, sending messages, creating posts, and managing connections. Uses browser automation with proxy and stealth support.
      21
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Fully featured MCP server that provides automation tools for LinkedIn, supporting browser-based scraping and API-based operations for content management, media uploads, and reactions.
      6
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A standalone MCP server that exposes typed LinkedIn capabilities (jobs, people, companies, posts, invitations, messaging) through the visible LinkedIn web UI, enabling workflow automation.
      31
      43 PyPI
      2
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 36 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes targeting different resources/actions (profiles, companies, jobs, messaging, feed). There is minor potential confusion between get_company vs search_companies, get_profile vs search_people, and follow_company vs follow_person, but the descriptions clarify the distinction between search vs direct access. The messaging tools (list_conversations, get_conversation, start_conversation, send_message) are well-separated by their distinct operations.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming follows a strong verb_noun pattern throughout: get_*, search_*, create_*, follow_*, update_*, send_*, etc. A few slight deviations exist like linkedin_login, linkedin_auth_status, linkedin_logout (using the linkedin_ prefix rather than a verb_noun pattern) and navigate, screenshot_page, close_browser which don't follow the resource-targeting pattern, but the majority is highly consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    36 tools is on the heavy end for a domain that could be consolidated. The server covers many sub-domains (profiles, companies, jobs, messaging, feed, notifications, auth), so the breadth justifies part of the count, but auth helpers (login, logout, auth_status) and utility tools (navigate, screenshot_page, close_browser) could arguably be grouped or reduced. Still, each tool serves a distinct function.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface is remarkably comprehensive for LinkedIn automation. It covers authentication lifecycle (login, auth_status, logout), profile viewing/editing (get_profile, get_my_profile, update_headline, update_about, open_profile_section), jobs lifecycle (search, get, save, easy_apply, saved, applications), messaging (list, get, start, send), feed engagement (get_feed, create_post, like, comment, repost), and networking (connections, people search, connection requests, invitations). There are no obvious dead-end operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues