Skip to main content
Glama
tiagojct

starbuck-mcp

by tiagojct
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to starbuck-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • CiteStamp MCP server by citestamp

      CiteStamp MCP serverofficial

      citestamp
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Ground citations before your agent emits them by checking references against public scholarly registries and flagging hallucinated or retracted ones.
      MIT

    • citation-check

      arhancanli
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables verifying citations in reference lists and BibTeX by detecting fabricated or mismatched references and retractions, and returning corrected BibTeX.
      3
      1
      MIT

    • verification-mcp

      guptaprakhariitr
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to fact-check claims, verify citations, and check source freshness using Wikipedia, Wikidata, Crossref, and Wayback Machine.
      1
      MIT

    • io.github.Hylouis233/bibverify

      OmarSenturk6657
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables researchers and AI assistants to verify bibliographic existence and metadata consistency, resolve DOI, PMID, PMCID, and arXiv identifiers, and perform explainable multi-source matching without destructive edits.
      -

    • io.github.mgdsn/verify-api-mcp

      mgdsn
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to verify whether citations exist and match canonical records, and whether URLs resolve and contain expected content, with evidence-backed confirmed, contradicted, or unknown verdicts.
      2
      39 PyPI
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    check_manuscript and check_references both check references, but their inputs differ clearly (manuscript vs. direct reference details), and the descriptions distinguish them. prepare_claims and record_claims are explicitly sequential steps, leaving little ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All four tools use a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: check_manuscript, check_references, prepare_claims, record_claims. No mixed conventions or vague verbs.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for a specialized citation- and claim-checking workflow. Each tool maps to a distinct stage or input mode, and none feels redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers manuscript checking, direct reference checking, claim preparation, and claim recording, which is strong lifecycle coverage for this domain. Minor gaps exist around report retrieval or configuration management, but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources