Skip to main content
Glama
thyn-ai

Algenta

Official
by thyn-ai
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Algenta

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • WhitePact

      Guruprasath-Annadurai
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes governance, trust-scoring, compliance, guardrail, cost, drift, and supply-chain scanning tools and resources to any MCP client over stdio, Streamable HTTP, or legacy HTTP+SSE. It lets agents route every tool call through a deterministic five-way decision (allow, redact, require approval, deny, or quarantine) with hash-chained evidence, human approval workflows, and in-agent trust gates for LangChain, LangGraph, and Google ADK.
      30
      59 PyPI
      2
      MIT

    • moo-tasks

      shekarsiri
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for agentic task orchestration and management, enabling AI agents to create goals, plan tasks with acceptance criteria, track dependencies, request human input, and provide proof of completion.
      253 npm
      3
      MIT

    • agent-guardrail

      rudimentall1
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agent guardrails — validates and signs agent decisions (OAA tokens) so third parties can verify them without server access
      3
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Context Every Agent Can ShareAgents share what they learn, hand off work, and keep it when you switch models. Start with 5 GB free.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 140 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a uniquely defined purpose with detailed descriptions, and overlapping tools (e.g., simulate vs compare vs recommend) are clearly differentiated by usage guidance and distinct output contracts. The use of prefixes like preview_ and product_ further disambiguates inline vs saved operations and simple vs advanced variants.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names consistently follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern (create_, get_, list_, update_, delete_, test_, etc.), with special prefixes like product_ and preview_ applied uniformly. There are no mixed conventions or camelCase names.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 140 tools, this server vastly exceeds the typical well-scoped range of 3-15 tools. While the breadth reflects a multi-domain platform, the extreme count makes it impractical for an agent to efficiently discover and select the correct tool, increasing cognitive load and risk of misselection.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface provides full CRUD and lifecycle coverage across all major domains: simulation, data connectors, datasets, agent runs, capabilities, repository intelligence, triggers, admin, billing, audit, models, and runtime libraries. Every domain includes creation, retrieval, listing, update/delete, and often testing or simulation tools, leaving no obvious gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources