Skip to main content
Glama
thuupx

memory-mcp-lite

by thuupx

Related Servers

Alternatives to memory-mcp-lite

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A persistent memory server that stores and retrieves atomic coding insights like architectural decisions and debugging patterns for AI agents. It enables agents to maintain institutional knowledge across sessions using semantic search and local SQLite storage.
      9 npm
      11
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to store, search, and recall persistent project-specific and cross-project context — decisions, preferences, error patterns, and guidelines — from a local-first SQLite memory store with semantic search, so knowledge survives across sessions. An optional companion task server lets agents queue and autonomously execute work using that same memory.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides persistent cross-session memory and full-text search for AI coding assistants, storing project context, decisions, and preferences while enabling searchable access to conversation history via local SQLite.
      8
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI coding assistants with persistent project memory to retain architectural decisions, code patterns, and domain knowledge across sessions. It stores data locally in a SQLite database, allowing agents to remember, recall, and manage project-specific context using full-text search.
      4 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight server that provides persistent memory and context management for AI assistants using local vector storage and database, enabling efficient storage and retrieval of contextual information through semantic search and indexed retrieval.
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct scope or action: summaries by level (global/project/task), retrieval (search vs detail), and persistence (fact vs decision vs summary upsert). No two tools have ambiguous boundaries.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (get_*, search_*, remember_*, upsert_*). The naming is predictable and clearly conveys each tool's purpose.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 9 tools, the server covers reading (3), searching (1), retrieving (1), remembering (2), and updating (2) summaries. This is well-scoped for a lightweight memory system.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core memory operations: read summaries at three levels, search, detail retrieval, and persist facts/decisions/summaries. Minor omission: no upsert_global_summary, but the domain is 'lite' and the gap is acceptable.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues