Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to china-law-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides offline access to the French legal corpus (Legifrance/DILA) with full-text search, verbatim article retrieval, and citation grounding to prevent hallucinations.
      4
      76 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Semantic and exact retrieval over 22M Taiwan court judgments with built-in citation guardrails — bundles carry a read-whitelist so downstream models cannot cite judgments whose reasoning was never read. Also provides exact lookup of administrative interpretations with lifecycle status (repealed / superseded / unverified).
      326
      Elastic 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants and agents to search a legal document collection via hybrid BM25+dense retrieval, read articles with context, and generate full or short citations. It also exposes whole acts as Markdown resources, provides a citation-answering prompt, and supports stdio and streamable HTTP transports.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables semantic search and retrieval of Chinese judicial cases from the Supreme People's Court case library, supporting natural language queries for similar cases, case details, filtering, and statistics.
      8
      10
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides read-only, citation-grounded Chinese AI compliance and filing Q&A, enabling agents to search regulations, retrieve requirements, generate self-check lists, and determine filing obligations with legal basis.
      6
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    search_statutes (NL retrieval) and get_article (exact law+article lookup) overlap somewhat, especially since search_statutes also does '直查优先' for exact citations. verify_citation also retrieves a law+article, but its validation-focused return (verified bool) distinguishes it from get_article's text retrieval, and check_citations_in_text is clearly distinct as a batch extractor.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All five tools use a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: search_statutes, get_article, list_laws, verify_citation, check_citations_in_text. The longer batch tool name remains readable and follows the same convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a legal retrieval/verification server, with each tool covering a distinct capability (search, exact fetch, browse, single verify, bulk verify). No redundant or filler tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core read-only legal workflow: search by NL, fetch by citation, browse the catalog, and verify single or bulk citations. Minor gaps like retrieving a full law's chapter structure or browsing by effective date exist, but the primary agent workflows are supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues