A
licenseNot graded
qualityB
maintenanceEnables AI agents to safely fetch malware samples, run isolated headless Ghidra static analysis, and retrieve decompiled function logic, imports, and strings through callable MCP tools.
MIT
Threat.Zone MCP Server
by threat-zone
Related Servers
Alternatives to Threat.Zone MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables assistants to analyze files and URLs for malware by integrating with security services like VirusTotal and ANY.RUN, returning threat reports.20MIT
scanmalware-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceWraps the ScanMalware.com API to enable phishing triage, malware scanning, and certificate inspection through natural language, allowing users to submit scans, retrieve results, and analyze threats via MCP tools.1Apache 2.0- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to run multi-stage CyberChef recipes, decode and encode data, deobfuscate payloads, calculate entropy, and decode JWTs through MCP tools.18100 npm3Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to access VirusTotal intelligence through MCP, supporting file, URL, domain, and IP lookups, plus analysis, via remote HTTP or local stdio.8MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to invoke DeepAnalyze's intelligent analysis capabilities through MCP tools, including multi-round reasoning, code execution, and file operations.-
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Scored across 31 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have distinct purposes targeting specific submission data types or actions, but some overlap exists. For example, get_submission_indicators and get_submission_iocs could be confusing as both relate to threat indicators, though their descriptions suggest iocs might be a subset. The three scan_file_* tools are well-differentiated by analysis type (CDR, sandbox, static).
Naming Consistency5/5
Tool names follow a highly consistent verb_noun pattern throughout. All tools use snake_case with clear prefixes: 'get_' for retrieval, 'download_' for file downloads, 'scan_' for analysis submissions, 'interpret_' for value translation, and 'search_' for searching. This consistency makes the tool set predictable and easy to navigate.
Tool Count3/5
With 31 tools, the count feels heavy for a threat analysis server. While the domain involves detailed submission data retrieval, many tools are variations fetching specific artifact types (DNS, HTTP, TCP, UDP, etc.) that could potentially be consolidated. The number exceeds typical well-scoped ranges (3-15 tools), suggesting some tool proliferation.
Completeness5/5
The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for a threat analysis platform. It includes submission creation (multiple scan types), retrieval (detailed artifacts, statuses, reports), search capabilities, user/system information, and interpretation helpers. There are no apparent gaps in the core workflow from submission to analysis results retrieval.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues