delete_app

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits. It indicates the confirm parameter must be true, implying a safety check, but does not reveal what happens on deletion (e.g., irreversibility, cascade effects, permission needs). The term 'delete' implies destructiveness, but no further detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise at two sentences, front-loading the action and key requirement. No excess wording.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (2 params, output schema exists, many siblings), the description lacks context about error conditions, return values, or constraints like app state. It does not help the agent distinguish from similar tools or understand prerequisites.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It only clarifies that confirm must be true, but does not describe app_name or the role of confirm beyond being required. The parameter semantics are minimally covered.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('delete') and the resource ('installed app'), making the tool's purpose unambiguous. It also specifies the required condition (confirm=True), which distinguishes it from other app-management tools like install or start.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description only mentions the confirm requirement but provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., stop_app, uninstall). It does not mention prerequisites, consequences, or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.