Skip to main content
Glama
thinkscoop-technologies

courtmesh-mcp

by thinkscoop-technologies
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to courtmesh-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • courtlistener-mcp

      Vaquill-AI
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides AI assistants access to the CourtListener legal database (US court opinions, dockets, RECAP, PACER, oral arguments, judges) and the full eCFR federal regulations via the official CourtListener API v4. It supports bring-your-own-key authentication and is designed for use with MCP-compatible clients like Claude, VS Code, and Cursor.
      34
      3
      MIT

    • canlii-mcp

      Vaquill-AI
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server providing AI assistants access to Canadian case law and legislation metadata from CanLII across all jurisdictions, supporting search and citation relationships.
      7
      4 npm
      5
      MIT

    • Legal MCP Server

      bsahane
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Indian legal work that enables case-law research with verified citations, limitation and deadline calculations, legal document drafting, matter tracking, and contract search.
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: get_case vs get_case_analysis clearly separate raw case data from AI analysis; analyze_case vs analyze_consolidated_case distinguish single vs multi-document analysis; search_indian_court_cases vs semantic_search_cases differentiate keyword vs semantic search; request_case_timeline and get_case_timeline form a clear start/poll pair. No two tools are likely to be confused.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern with verbs like get, search, analyze, request, check. There is slight inconsistency: 'find_related_cases' could be 'search_related_cases' or 'get_related_cases', and 'request_case_timeline' uses request while its pair uses get. However, the naming is generally predictable and the intent is clear.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range. Each tool covers a distinct aspect of legal case research (retrieval, analysis, search, timeline, PDF, health), and none feel redundant or unnecessary. The count matches the apparent scope of the server.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface provides full coverage for the domain: search cases, get case details, read and generate AI analysis (both single and consolidated), find related cases, retrieve PDFs, and fetch timelines. The addition of search_judges and health check round out the workflow. No major gaps are apparent for the stated purpose of accessing Indian court case data and analysis.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources