Delete Coda Row

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explicitly states 'This action is irreversible,' which adds behavioral context beyond the destructiveHint annotation. It also mentions the return value (confirmation with request ID), providing transparency about the tool's side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded with the action and irreversibility. However, the parameter list is redundant with the schema, and the structure could be slightly more compact by omitting the arg list.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that there is no output schema, the description covers the return value (confirmation). It does not mention permissions, rate limits, or error cases, but for a simple deletion tool, the context is largely complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description repeats the parameter names and types with brief explanations (e.g., 'The document ID'), but adds no new meaning beyond what the schema already provides. No extra constraints or format details are given.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Delete a specific row from a Coda table,' which is a specific verb and resource. However, it does not differentiate this tool from the sibling tool 'coda_delete_rows' (bulk delete) or other row manipulation tools, so it lacks sibling distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like coda_update_row, coda_upsert_rows, or coda_delete_rows. There are no prerequisites or contextual hints for appropriate use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.