A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceA self-hosted MCP server enabling multiple AI coding agents to share state, preserve context across sessions, and coordinate with each other.
30 npm
Apache 2.0
anchor-mcp
by thewillmoss
Related Servers
Alternatives to anchor-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP server that enables multiple AI coding tools to share structured project state (decisions, tasks, bugs) so they coordinate without re-explaining.5MIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI coding assistants persistent memory across sessions with chain-based project tracking, tickets, and structured handoffs.42GPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA local-first MCP server that provides a shared Markdown-based memory for AI coding agents, enabling cross-agent context persistence via tools like memory_search and memory_capture.101MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides persistent project context, workflow management, and knowledge capture for AI coding agents. It enables agents to maintain structured memory across sessions by tracking project profiles, conventions, skills, and technical debt.7-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI coding agents persistent memory across sessions, storing architecture decisions, past bugs, and codebase conventions locally.1 npmMIT
TDQS
A3.8/5.0
Scored across 6 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each manager tool targets a distinct resource (tasks, plans, notepads, memory, rules), and promote_learning is a clearly separate action that bridges plans and rules. There is no overlap or ambiguity in purpose.
Naming Consistency4/5
Five tools follow a consistent 'X_manager' pattern, but promote_learning breaks the pattern with a verb_noun style. The names are all snake_case and readable, but the one deviation prevents a perfect score.
Tool Count5/5
Six tools is an appropriate size for a project management and knowledge assistant. Each tool covers a clear domain area, and the count feels neither sparse nor overwhelming.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers list, read, create/update for five resource types, plus a special promotion action. The main gap is the lack of explicit delete or remove operations for resources, but this is likely a design choice and can be worked around.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues