Skip to main content
Glama
thestandard-production

openmausbot-cua-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to openmausbot-cua-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI clients to invoke CLI-driven agent tools over Streamable HTTP, including shell execution, file operations, patching, image viewing, web search, and nested agent tasks, with permission modes and real-time progress streaming.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to securely control and interact with a local Windows machine through 218 configurable tools for files, Git, processes, Windows UI, browser automation, WSL, Office, recovery, skills, and child MCP servers.
      2 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables browser-based AI chat interfaces to use local MCP tools by injecting a tool-call protocol into the page and executing approved filesystem, shell, and downstream MCP tool calls from a local daemon.
      451 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets ChatGPT, Claude Desktop, Claude Code, and other MCP clients run an allowlisted set of local commands and read files from a chosen directory, so an assistant can analyse a codebase or trigger local generators (images, sprites, assets) without metered API tokens. The server is read-only and deny-by-default by default, with no shell, path containment, opt-in writes, and required auth when exposed over HTTP.
      3
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 25 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources and actions, with clear separation between listing, mutating, and CUA-driver operations. Minor confusion is possible between openmausbot_api_health and openmausbot_status, and between the generic openmausbot_plan and the per-resource 'plan or apply' mutation tools, but descriptions mostly mitigate this.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All tools share the openmausbot_ prefix, which helps, but verb patterns are mixed: list_bots vs get_companion_settings vs usage vs status, and cua_skills_status/cua_permissions_status/cua_check_update deviate from the list_/set_ convention. The naming is readable but not uniformly predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 25 tools, this sits at the heavy end of the acceptable range. The count is somewhat justified by covering bot management, routines, webhooks, usage, companion settings, and the CUA-driver surface, but it feels like several smaller logical servers have been merged into one.

    Completeness3/5

    Routine lifecycle is well covered with upsert, enable/disable, run, and delete, and companion settings have get/set. However, webhooks are list-only with no create/update/delete, bots lack create/delete, and the CUA-driver tools only inspect and invoke rather than manage the driver itself, leaving notable gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues