Skip to main content
Glama
theserverlessdev

WSC - Writing Style Checker

by theserverlessdev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to WSC - Writing Style Checker

Related Servers

  • TrueVoice MCP

    howdoiusekeyboard
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables detection and elimination of AI slop in text, providing tools to analyze writing for overused phrases, structural issues, and verbosity, and offers human writing rules tailored to context.
    3
    2
    MIT

  • signs-of-ai

    peopleworks
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Bilingual (EN/ES) AI-writing detection that shows the evidence instead of a percentage: named tells with line and column, hidden-character inspection, and citation cross-checking against a document's own bibliography. Seven of its nine tools run entirely locally and never touch the network.
    10
    23
    MIT

  • Zero Slop

    manavmishra
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Zero Slop edits AI-assisted writing through MCP, reducing stock phrasing and repetition while checking grammar and flow. It returns the rewrite with writing scores and flags detected changes to names, numbers, quotations, and links.
    1,629 npm
    117
    MIT
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

A4.7/5.0

Scored across 4 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: check_file vs check_text differ by input source, fix_duplicates is for fixing a specific issue, and list_word_lists provides reference data. No overlap in functionality.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (check_file, check_text, fix_duplicates, list_word_lists), making the API predictable.

Tool Count5/5

With 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for a writing style checker: two input methods for analysis, one fix action, and one list action. Not overly sparse or heavy.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers core checking and duplicate removal, but lacks auto-fix for other issue types (e.g., weasel words, passive voice). Users must manually edit text after reports, which is a minor gap.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessUnresponsive

Resources