Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: check_file vs check_text differ by input source, fix_duplicates is for fixing a specific issue, and list_word_lists provides reference data. No overlap in functionality.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (check_file, check_text, fix_duplicates, list_word_lists), making the API predictable.
With 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for a writing style checker: two input methods for analysis, one fix action, and one list action. Not overly sparse or heavy.
The tool surface covers core checking and duplicate removal, but lacks auto-fix for other issue types (e.g., weasel words, passive voice). Users must manually edit text after reports, which is a minor gap.