A
licenseNot graded
qualityF
maintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables multiple AI agents to share memory, coordinate tasks, and collaborate effectively across IDEs and CLI tools.
5 npm
17
MIT
Beep Boop MCP
by thesammykins
Related Servers
Alternatives to Beep Boop MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Discord-based AI agent-user communication. Enables AI agents to communicate with users through Discord instead of IDE chat interfaces.59MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA shared memory and coordination server for multiple AI coding agents, built on the Model Context Protocol (MCP).5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA filesystem-based MCP server for AI coding agents to coordinate work across git worktrees by claiming files, checking for conflicts, and logging progress without affecting the repository's git history.5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA local-first MCP server for coordinating parallel AI coding sessions with tools like Claude Code and Codex in a single repository.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that turns multiple AI coding agents into a coordinated team that chats, debates, remembers, audits security, and works in parallel on the same project.MIT
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Scored across 7 tools
Disambiguation3/5
Tools have overlapping purposes that could cause confusion, particularly around work coordination. For example, 'create_beep' and 'end_work' both handle work completion with beep files, and 'check_status' includes cleanup functionality that overlaps with 'end_work'. However, descriptions help clarify specific use cases, preventing complete misselection.
Naming Consistency4/5
Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., 'check_status', 'create_beep', 'update_boop'), which aids predictability. Minor deviations exist with 'initiate_conversation' using 'initiate' instead of a more common verb like 'start', but overall naming is coherent and readable.
Tool Count5/5
With 7 tools, the count is well-scoped for the server's dual purposes of work coordination and platform communication. Each tool appears to serve a distinct role, avoiding bloat while covering necessary operations like status checks, file management, and messaging.
Completeness4/5
The tool set covers core workflows for work coordination (initiate, update, complete, check) and platform communication (initiate, update), with no major gaps. A minor gap exists in lacking a tool to delete or manage stale beep files, but agents can work around this using existing cleanup in 'check_status'.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues