FlixBridge
Related Servers
Alternatives to FlixBridge
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA comprehensive Model Context Protocol server that bridges LLMs with self-hosted media services, enabling natural language control of TV shows, movies, downloads, and notifications while maintaining traditional API access.11AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to query and manage Plex Media Server content through natural language, providing library access, viewing statistics, and media management capabilities.5815851JavaScriptMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that creates a bridge between AI language models and the Trakt.tv API, allowing LLMs to access real-time entertainment data and personal Trakt viewing history.44MIT
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceA bridge server that connects Agent Communication Protocol (ACP) agents with Model Context Protocol (MCP) clients, enabling seamless integration between ACP-based AI agents and MCP-compatible tools like Claude Desktop.1624MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for managing a media server stack (Plex, Radarr, Overseerr, Bazarr, Prowlarr, Trakt.tv) using natural language to browse, request, and discover content.12MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that exposes Sonarr, Radarr, Lidarr, and Jellyfin to any MCP client through a curated tool layer for LLM consumption.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Several tools overlap heavily, especially all_services_diagnostics, queue_diagnostics, and import_issues, which all deal with stuck queue items and import failures. system_status, server_metrics, and download_status also blur the line between health/performance and download status.
Names are a mix of noun-first, verb-first, and adjective-noun forms without a consistent pattern. Examples like queue_list, list_services, and add_new show inconsistent conventions; queue_grab reverses the expected verb_noun order.
16 tools is on the higher end for the apparent scope, and several diagnostic/status tools could be consolidated. The count is not absurd, but it feels heavier than necessary due to redundancy.
Core media management workflows are covered: search, add, queue management, imports, history, removal, and configuration listings. A notable gap is direct library listing/management beyond content removal, though the surface covers the main ARR-type workflows.