Skip to main content
Glama
therealsachin

Langfuse MCP Server

get_dataset

Retrieve detailed information about a specific dataset by name to analyze Langfuse analytics, cost metrics, and usage data across projects.

Instructions

Get detailed information about a specific dataset by name.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
datasetNameYesName of the dataset to retrieve

Implementation Reference

  • The main async handler function that implements the core logic of the 'get_dataset' tool. It fetches the dataset from the Langfuse client using the provided datasetName and returns formatted JSON content or an error response.
    export async function getDataset(
      client: LangfuseAnalyticsClient,
      args: GetDatasetArgs
    ) {
      try {
        const data = await client.getDataset(args.datasetName);
        return {
          content: [{ type: 'text' as const, text: JSON.stringify(data, null, 2) }],
        };
      } catch (error) {
        const errorMessage = error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error);
        return {
          content: [{ type: 'text' as const, text: `Error: ${errorMessage}` }],
          isError: true,
        };
      }
    }
  • Zod schema defining the input parameters for the 'get_dataset' tool, specifically requiring a non-empty datasetName string.
    export const getDatasetSchema = z.object({
      datasetName: z.string().min(1).describe('Name of the dataset to retrieve'),
    });
  • src/index.ts:662-675 (registration)
    Tool registration in the allTools array used by listToolsRequestHandler. Defines the tool's name, description, and input schema for MCP protocol advertisement.
    {
      name: 'get_dataset',
      description: 'Get detailed information about a specific dataset by name.',
      inputSchema: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {
          datasetName: {
            type: 'string',
            description: 'Name of the dataset to retrieve',
          },
        },
        required: ['datasetName'],
      },
    },
  • Dispatch handler in the main CallToolRequestSchema switch statement that parses arguments using the schema and invokes the getDataset handler function.
    case 'get_dataset': {
      const args = getDatasetSchema.parse(request.params.arguments);
      return await getDataset(this.client, args);
    }
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It implies a read operation ('Get detailed information'), but doesn't specify whether it requires authentication, has rate limits, returns structured data, or handles errors. For a tool with zero annotation coverage, this is a significant gap in transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence: 'Get detailed information about a specific dataset by name.' It is front-loaded with the core purpose, has no wasted words, and is appropriately sized for a simple tool. Every part of the sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain what 'detailed information' includes, the return format, or any behavioral traits like error handling. For a tool with no structured support, the description should provide more context to be fully helpful to an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description coverage is 100%, with the parameter 'datasetName' fully documented in the input schema. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, such as format examples or constraints. With high schema coverage, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate as the description doesn't compensate but doesn't need to.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Get detailed information about a specific dataset by name.' It specifies the verb ('Get'), resource ('dataset'), and scope ('by name'), making it easy to understand. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'list_datasets' or 'get_dataset_item', which would require a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention sibling tools like 'list_datasets' for listing all datasets or 'get_dataset_item' for dataset items, nor does it specify prerequisites or exclusions. This leaves the agent without context for tool selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/therealsachin/langfuse-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server