get_webhook_events

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations provide readOnlyHint and openWorldHint. The description adds the default behavior (last 24h) but does not disclose potential response size limits, pagination, or error conditions. It adds some value over annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence that is front-loaded and contains no unnecessary words. Every part is informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the low schema coverage (0%) and no output schema, the description covers the core purpose and parameter semantics. However, it omits details about the response content, which would be helpful for a simple tool with no output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description gives meaning to the 'since' parameter by stating it is a timestamp with a default of last 24h. With 0% schema coverage, this compensates well, though it does not specify the exact format (e.g., ISO 8601).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Replay' and resource 'webhook delivery events', and includes a time constraint. It clearly distinguishes from sibling tools like list_webhooks which lists webhook subscriptions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for retrieving past webhook events with an optional timestamp, but does not provide explicit when-not-to-use guidance or mention alternatives. It is clear in context but lacks exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.