Skip to main content
Glama
mailfact-mcp

mailfact-mcp

Official
by thenewit-eu

Related Servers

Alternatives to mailfact-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables authenticated, read-only access to mailbox folders, tags, message metadata, and message text via MCP, while preventing send, draft, delete, move, tag-change, contact/calendar changes, and attachment downloads.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables read-only lookup and analysis of SaaS applications, transactions, invoices, spend, renewals, and people, including spend summaries, upcoming renewals, and missing-invoice checks, through an MCP client.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables read-only access to Google Marketing Platform data across GMP Admin, Display & Video 360, Campaign Manager 360, and Search Ads 360 through OAuth-authenticated MCP tools for discovering accounts, campaigns, reports, and performance metrics.
      32
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables read-only inspection of Google Ads accounts through MCP, including account inventory, reporting, metadata, change history, and safe GAQL queries.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables read-only access to Wise Business API profiles, balances, account statements, and card-spending data through MCP tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables read-only access to stored Meta advertising account, campaign, and insight report snapshots through scoped, expiring API keys and three MCP tools.
      59 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources (domains, summaries, reporter orgs, sending sources, raw reports), and descriptions clarify boundaries. However, the record-oriented trio (query_records, get_report_records, list_aggregate_reports) plus get_alignment_summary overlap conceptually, so an agent may hesitate between drilling into records versus reports.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names follow a clean verb_noun pattern (list_domains, get_domain, get_alignment_summary, list_sending_sources, query_records). The only deviation is whoami, which is idiomatic but breaks the pattern slightly.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well-scoped for a DMARC aggregate-reporting server, with each tool earning its place across domains, summaries, coverage, sources, and raw records.

    Completeness4/5

    The read-only reporting surface is broadly complete: domains, policy snapshots, daily summaries, reporter coverage, sending sources, and raw report access are all present. Minor gap: no mutation tools (e.g. registering a domain or publishing a DMARC policy), though read-only may be the intended scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing