YouTube MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to YouTube MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search videos, read channels, browse playlists, fetch comments, and get transcripts from YouTube using the YouTube Data API v3 and InnerTube API for captions.2GPL 3.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search videos, retrieve transcripts and metadata, analyze channels, and access trending and engagement analytics for YouTube content.17 npm-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to retrieve YouTube channel overviews, Studio analytics, video performance, traffic source breakdowns, and comments for sentiment analysis using natural language prompts.81MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceProvides comprehensive access to YouTube Data, Analytics, and Reporting APIs, enabling AI assistants to manage videos, analyze performance, handle comments, and extract transcripts.40MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with YouTube channels, providing analytics, video metadata updates, transcript extraction, and comment management through official Google APIs with OAuth 2.0.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI tools to access YouTube content, including transcript extraction, video/channel info, and search.49 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Most tools target a distinct resource+action (search_videos vs get_video vs analyze_channel vs get_channel_analytics), and the transcript family is well separated by purpose. The main risk is get_channel vs get_my_channel and get_transcript vs get_transcripts, but the descriptions explicitly explain when to use which, so an agent can disambiguate reliably.
Every tool follows a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (get_channel, list_accounts, search_videos, update_video, delete_video, reply_to_comment). The `my`/`transcripts` variants are still within the same convention, so there is no stylistic drift.
16 tools is on the heavier side but each one maps to a clear capability (read, search, analytics, moderation, mutation), so nothing feels redundant. It sits just above the ideal band but remains well-scoped for the breadth of the YouTube domain.
Coverage is strong: channel/video read, search, transcripts, comments, analytics, plus update and delete for videos and comment replies. The notable gap is video creation/upload and playlist management, which means the lifecycle is read/update/delete without a create path, but core analysis and management workflows are covered.