Skip to main content
Glama
thenavidm
by thenavidm

Related Servers

Alternatives to Shotstack MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and clients to discover and use 75 V5 design-automation tools for templates, images, animations, media jobs, workflows, assets, publications, webhooks, and Instant URLs, with explicit mutation approval, local previews, and isolated private workspace profiles.
      75
      18 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to connect to tools and data through a governed MCP endpoint with agent identity, scoped permissions, guardrails, and full audit trails. Access is user-controlled and can be revoked instantly, with every tool call logged by agent identity and timestamp.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables any MCP-compatible AI agent to generate videos and images from text or reference frames, chain scenes into seamless multi-scene films with sound and speech, and download finished media with manifests and previews. It also exposes account status, plan limits, history and library management through confirm-gated, safe-by-default operations.
      14
      34
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible agents to perform read-only incident investigations by querying logs, building timelines, searching runbooks, validating evidence, and creating ticket drafts only with explicit approval.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to access and manage versioned robotics development state, including artifacts, changes, evidence, reviews, and execution context, through read-only, developer, or reviewer MCP profiles.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource+action and descriptions clarify boundaries (e.g. get_asset vs get_asset_by_render_id). Some grouping is dense — ingest_source, transfer_asset, and create_upload_url_file all concern getting files in, and render vs render_template vs generate_asset require reading descriptions to distinguish. Still, each has a clearly stated purpose an agent can match to.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Predominantly consistent verb_noun snake_case (get_render, list_templates, create_template, delete_source). Minor deviations: 'render' lacks a noun object, and 'probe_media' uses a less common verb, but nothing is ambiguous or chaotically mixed.

    Tool Count4/5

    23 tools span three logical sub-APIs (edit, serve, ingest) plus asset generation, so the count is high but largely earned. Slightly on the heavy side, with some read/write pairs that could arguably be consolidated, but nothing feels redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    Templates have full CRUD, sources and assets have get/list/create/delete, and rendering plus generation are covered with status polling. Minor gaps exist: no cancel-render, no list-renders, and serve assets have no list endpoint, but core workflows are workable.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues